- Recent
- Popular
- Tags (11)
- Subscribers (33)
- Facebook Goes After Their Trademark in Popular DomainsMarch 18
-
It’s common practice, and perhaps necessary for large companies to protect their Trademark. I’ve written before about Google going after an incorrect spelling of their own Trademark, on http://googleappsengine.com, because it resembles one of their products. Twitter is known to also go after domains with not only “Twitter” in the name, but “Tweet” and even “Twit” (even though that specific trademark is owned by Leo Laporte). It has long been known that Facebook Apps are not to have the name “Facebook” in their names, but it would appear that Facebook is starting to go after domain names too. Just recently, they have asked such major sites as Mari Smith’s WhyFacebook.com, to change their name in defense of their own Trademark.In a post on Mari’s Facebook Page, Mari stated, “I took down my WhyFacebook.com blog this week. Long story. But basically Facebook are on a mission to reclaim a
- Facebook Starting to Test Fan Page NotificationsMarch 18
-
My wife just got an interesting e-mail notification from Facebook about a Facebook Page she is a fan of. The notification was a summary of the activity on the Page for the day. The text of the e-mail goes as such:“Here is this week’s summary for the Facebook Page: **************
0 Fans this week (7 total Fans)
0 Wall Posts, Comments, and Likes this week (0 last week)
2 Visits to your page this week (1 Visits last week)Update your Fans:
http://www.facebook.com/n/?pages%2F*********
Visit your Insights Page:
http://www.facebook.com/n/?business%2Finsights%2F*********
Get more Fans with Facebook Ads:
http://www.facebook.com/n/?ads%2Fcreate%2F&src=pg_edit&fbid=***************Thanks,
T - Not Using a Service Any More? Here is the Polite Thing to Do:March 17
-
The Social Web is full of Nomads. We try out a service, set up camp, and constantly move from place to place as we discover new and better places to settle down our social presence. I’m no stranger to this myself. I’ve given up my share of services in the past, and I am far from loyal to any one service. IMO, making yourself loyal to any one service brings bias, keeps you from discovering and truly learning about other services, and prevents you from benefiting the most from tools that could actually benefit you. It’s for that reason you have, and can expect to see me constantly move from service to service as you read my content here on this blog. What I like now may not be what I like later. I even quit Twitter and Buzz for short periods of time. I think there’s courtesy however when you do this – I’ve done this both the wrong and right way on various services I’ve joined and left. Here is the right way to leave a service:If you chose to no longer use a service, disassociate your accounts. It’s that easy. If you’re no longer going to invest time in a service, the polite thing to do is remove ways they can co
- Twitter Launches Facebook Connect Competitor, @AnywhereMarch 15
-
I’ve long talked about the MVC model of the Building Block web. Data Repositories like Amazon Simple Storage, Facebook Data Store, Google Data, and others comprise the Model of this new platform. APIs like the Twitter API, the Facebook server-side APIs, or other REST-type APIs compose the Controllers of this web. Then you have the View – something pretty much only Facebook and OpenSocial/Google Friend Connect have covered thus far. The View enables developers to easily integrate and access code from a user’s Client, the web browser. Today Twitter added their entry to that game, @Anywhere.@Anywhere strives to provide a solution for a huge weakness in the Twitter API Platform thus far. It provides an entire Javascript, Client-side platform for developers and website owners to integrate Twitter easily and simply right on top of their website, no server-side
- I’ve Been a Little Rough on Google LatelyMarch 13
-
For having posted just less than 1,000 posts, this blog has gotten a lot of attention in just the last one or two years. It used to be when I posted something I would get few comments (I still wish I had more), little traffic, and I knew it was only going to perhaps a few hundred eyes at most in an RSS Reader somewhere. But it took off. I’m not saying this to gloat, and I accept that I’m nowhere near a TechCrunch or a Mashable in terms of readers or traffic, but I’ve quickly learned that some times when I say things here it seems to have a lot of influence. Some times my articles end up on Techmeme. Some times people like TechCrunch and Mashable mention what I say. Some times Google employees talk about them. Not only that, but it goes out to near 25,000 people on Twitter, thousands on FriendFeed, not to mention the thousands of subscribers that read this in their RSS Reader. I tend to forget that when I talk here, it has the potential for a lot of people to read what I say. It’s not the old days of when I would just strive to get someone to read my stuff. For that, I apologize – I’ve been a little negative on Google lately without realizing the implications, and I want to make ammends.The truth is, I like Google
